was enacted a month ago and explained to the public more fully just a week ago. Gary was a two-fer, a district slammed for both low test scores and for failing to get enough money to keep itself solvent. Within roughly five minutes, a charter company was putting in its bid to run the formerly-public school system.
The proposed management group is the Phalen Leadership Academies, a group with strong ties to Indianapolis's big charter boosters with giant apsirations loaded into its name-- the Mind Trust. The group was founded by a former Indianapolis mayor and his head of charter schoolery, and it has done a fine job of finding ways to funnel public tax dollars into private pockets. So there are plenty of specific and historical reasons to oppose Phalen's glomming up one more set of de-public schools.
But the whole takeover process is itself a scam of tremendous proportions, a house of cards resting on a foundation of falsehoods.
Remember, the basic idea here is, "You public school people couldn't make this school work, so we're going to bring in someone who can." Let's consider that premise for a moment.
What's your secret?
The takeover premise requires someone who knows the secret of making a school "work." Someone who knows more about how to educate children than the trained professionals who previously ran the school. Let's mull on that for a second-- if this person (or person's company) knows the secret of Making Schools Work, what exactly have they been doing? Why have we not already hear about them? Why are they not already rich from running seminars and presenting training and having entire states adopt their special techniques for success? Why aren't principals and teachers falling all over themselves to bring these people in to run professional development so that we can all be awesomely successful? Why haven't we all heard and read about their great success?
Have they had these Secrets for Success all along, but they've been sitting on them, saying, "Well, we're not sharing this with anybody unless they pay us a bunch of money." And if so, are those the kind of people we want running schools?
Or could it be that these takeover artists don't know a damn thing more about educating students and running a school than the rest of us?
What's the cost?
In addition to pulling off the trick of deploying super-secret education techniques unknown to anyone who actually works in public education, takeover artists must also pull off some financial magic.
The takeover artists must run the school with the same money as the "failed" managers-- and they must somehow squeeze that piggy bank so that there is money left over to pay the takeover company.
In other words, they must keep doing what the school was always doing for the same amount of money, and have more money left at the end. Which means, of course, that they can only pull this off if they don't keep doing what the school was always doing. That means cutting programs or closing facilities or paying bottom dollar for personnel (and therefor having their pick of hiring from among all the people who couldn't get real jobs).
The fantasy is that schools-- even, somehow, schools that are in financial distress-- are loaded with such waste that a savvy business person can find efficiencies and eliminate waste., which is sort of true if one believes that paying teachers or offering certain programs are wasteful. Or, of course, one might believe that certain students, by virtue of their special needs, cost too much money to keep a trim budget, and so those students must be pushed elsewhere.
The central lie
The heart of the takeover idea is that there are people out there who know special secrets-- how to educate students, how to run schools, how to do it all for less money-- that somehow nobody in public education knows. But we've had these companies in business for years now, and there's no reason to believe that the heart of the takeover idea is anything but a profitable falsehood.