Feed A Teacher For A Year

I get plenty of pitches--news releases from folks who want to help me come up with some content (and who frequently have never actually read what I write) and mostly I ignore them, but this one caught my attention because it involves free food for a teacher for a year.

The company involved is Sun Basket, which touts itself as "the leading healthy eating service"-- another one of those outfits where you sign up and a box full of ingredients shows up on your doorstep, just waiting for you to chef it into some delicious shape. Sun Basket seems to put a lot of emphasis on healthy lifestyle, organic, best choicey ingredients, and features a variety of 11 different subscriptions, from the dubious (Paleo) to the responsible (Pescatarian, Carb-Conscious). The company was founded in 2014 by Adam Zbar, one of those entrepreneurial types who started at McKinsey, and Justine Kelly whose name I gather might mean something to you if you are a foodie (or foodie-adjacent). Did I mention the company is based in San Francisco?

The contest is called Treat Your Teacher, and it's simple. You nominate a teacher living in the US (except for AK, HI, and parts of MT, NM, and ND-- don't complain to me-- I didn't make the rules), explain why they're awesome. Ten of the nominees will win a Sun Basket account that will cover three meals a week for the whole school year.

The basic procedure:

Nominations opened on August 15, 2019, and close on September 5, 2019

Nominations to include:
Teacher's name, grade or subject taught, city, state, school
Must teach grade K-12
250 words or less on why your teacher is exceptional

You can email treatyourteacher@sunbasket.com or share on Instagram or Facebook using #treatyourteacher and @sunbasket, and must include the teacher's name and school, the grade/subject they teach, and a short blurb on what makes them exceptional.

Winners will be announced September 14, 2019, on social media and will be contacted via email.

You can also get the info at the contest website.

Yes, you'll be helping this company up its social media profile, and I've only done a cursory check to see if they're involved in any unpleasant causes, and they don't seem to be. Also part of their pitch is that they're backed "by top-tier venture capitalists, which-- eww." But still.

A campaign built around showing support for teachers throughout the US. Fancy free food for a teacher you love for a school year.I don't see down side here, other than when all of you enter, it will make the competition stiffer for the entry I'm writing for my wife.

The Problem With Comparisons In Education

Which is the best movie: Ghostbusters, Singin' In The Rain, Casablanca, or Avengers: Endgame?

It depends, of course, on how we choose to compare them. Based on level of romance? On the happiest ending? Best dancing? Most money made? Best use of Sigourney Weaver? Criteria make all the difference. But it's not just the criteria; it's the problems with criteria that naturally emerge from the mandate to compare.

One of the driving features of modern education reform has been the mandate to compare. Fans of free market education want to be able to compare schools; several reform programs targeted schools that ranked in the bottom five percent. The New Teacher Project (TNTP) made a huge splash in 2009 with "The Widget Effect" arguing that we should compare teachers and make staffing and pay decisions based on the results. Ranking schools is as important to U.S. News as swimsuits are to Sports Illustrated.

There are problems applying comparisons to education.

Comparisons are not measurements. Pat may be ranked the tallest or shortest student in class, but either way, knowing Pat's ranking does not tell me how tall Pat actually is. "Most improved" may make good advertising copy, but your enterprise can be "most improved" and still be terrible.

This problem only increases as we deal with more complex systems. The better a measure is for making comparisons, the worse it is for actually describing the thing being measured.

If we want to describe what makes a particular school great, or where it is falling short of greatness, we have to talk about a complex web of factors in the school and community--everything from teacher content knowledge to curricular offerings to community socio-economic information to what the stakeholders in the community value and expect from their school, as well as a long-term look at what graduates of the system think five, ten, twenty, forty years later. The list of factors that describe a school, as well as those who work in it, is hundreds of items long.

But creating a clear comparison of thousands of schools based on a hundred-item list of factors is as impossible as ranking great movies. So people who want to compare schools have come up with various truncated lists, lists that are so simplified that they fail to provide any real picture of individual schools.

The answer for modern education reform has been to use standardized math and reading test scores as the measure of schools (and school districts and school teachers). This makes comparison easy because it narrows the long, long list of criteria down to just one. But one data point makes a lousy descriptor of an entire complex organization like a school. And this is a particularly lousy descriptor, because research shows again and again that test scores can be predicted by basic income and demographic data. Students from wealthy families get better test scores.

Worse, when we do a comparison based on a simplified single measure, we encourage folks to pursue that single measured quality. This is exactly what has happened in many schools. While stakeholders may care about the arts programs and school atmosphere and teacher experience and traditions that have made that school great, schools have been told that their greatness will be measured by test scores, and so elements from recess to history class have been dropped so that the school can focus on the single measure. (And for the moment, let's not even get started on the idea that VAM scores would allow us to compare a third grade phys ed teacher to an 11th grade history teacher.)

More complex measures of school quality are possible; Beyond Test Scores by Jack Schneider details the work done with such a model in Somerville, Massachusetts. Certainly many parents engage in informal complex assessments ("I like West Egg High School because the English teachers are really good, they have a great football team, the band is awesome, most of my family has gone there, it's a nice safe school, the principal is a great guy, and it's located close to our neighborhood") but those are as varied as all the stakeholders in a school district.

In the end, education reformers have to face a simple limitation--if an assessment tool is good for comparing and ranking schools, it is not a good tool for describing the strengths and weaknesses of that school. You can do one or the other, but not both. A tool for ranking schools (or teachers or districts) will not provide the information needed to strengthen and improve that school. When creating a tool, the very first question that must be addressed is which goal you want to achieve--do you want to compare schools, or do you want to help them improve. As the saying goes, repeatedly weighing the pig will not cause it to gain weight, but it will also not tell you whether or not the pig would make a good addition to your household.

Originally posted at Forbes.com

FL: Educational Hypocrisy On Display

Oh, Florida.

Maybe it was the principal who wasn't sure the Holocaust was a thing. Maybe it was the latest round of teaching mandates passed down, like the last minute mental health mandate. Or maybe he's just still cranky from his ongoing fight with Duval County Schools.

But Florida's education czar Richard Corcoran has had enough.

This guy.

Florida school districts had better fall in line. They had better be implementing the state-mandated Holocaust instruction. They had better be teaching what they're supposed to be teaching. They had better be following all the instructional standards and mandates. If not, he will use all the tools at his disposal. This, mind you, in the state that has vowed to end Common Core once and for all because federally mandated micromanagement is bad, but apparently state-level micromanagement is fine.

Critics suggest that this is one more attempt by Florida's government to come up with excuses to take over public school systems and hand them off to charter operators. This might seem like a bit of paranoia except for two things:

1) This is Florida we're talking about.

2) The various regulations and mandates do not apply to charter schools.

Yup. While Corcoran is railing against public schools that don't follow the state's mandates, charter schools are still free to teach about Jesus riding on dinosaurs and the flat earth and how the Holocaust is just a story fabricated to gin up sympathy for Jewish folks. It's not the first time that Florida's elected leaders have jettisoned accountability in favor of the ability to move those public tax dollars into private pockets.

But it's a reminder once again that Florida is working hard to bind and break public education while making sure that every day is Christmas for charter and voucher schools.

PA: Governor Puts Charters On Notice

It was not so long ago that Pennsylvania's Governor Tom Wolf made charter supporters sad by rejecting the claim that charters are public schools. Today, he took another step and put charters in PA on notice.

At a news conference at a school in Allentown, Wolf said he would take executive action to change state regulations for charters, including tightening ethics standards. He also said he would push to revise Pennsylvania’s charter law, which he called “one of the most fiscally irresponsible laws in the nation."

Wolf also said that the current system "isn't good for anyone," harkening back to 2016 when the Auditor General called PA charter laws “simply the worst charter school law in the United States.” And he also gave special mention to cyber-charters, which have become a boondoggly cash grab of epic proportions in Pennsylvania.

What he will do, exactly, is unclear. There have been some bills that were lofted this year that would provide some good ideas-- like the bill that made it so that a school district would pay cyber-school tuition only if that school district did not offer a cyber-school option of their own. Heck, it would be nice to see a simple rule that said that charters could never again claim (in their taxpayer funded marketing materials) that they are "free." Rather, make them state publicly that they are funded with taxpayer dollars.

Wolk's executive order seems designed to bring charter oversight and transparency laws in line with those of state actors, along with yet another attempt to fix the funding problems.

Wolf acknowledges that with a GOP lock on the legislature, he's limited in options. The PA legislature has repeatedly proposed "charter school reform" bills, and they are consistently exactly what the charter industry would write for themselves in a constant search for more freedom to make a buck.

Someone pointed out that the administration could at least pull the plug on the cyber charters that are currently operating without current charters in place, and Wolf seemed to find that idea piquant.

But mostly he's proposing an executive action (aka end run around legislature) to hit charters with ethics and transparency, two areas that are a problem in PA. And there are some signs that something might actually happen. The head of the Senate Appropriations Committee, Pat Browne, chimed in:

“The governor’s actions today are an indication of the seriousness of the concerns for the current funding of public charter and cyber charter schools and its effect on overall public school finance in Pennsylvania," Browne, R- Lehigh, said. “It has reached a crisis point creating the potential of significant detrimental effects on all of our students’ progress in school.”

Now, Browne also said that the legislature hasn't been able to solve the problem because they haven't figured out how to make both charters and public schools happy. That seems nearly impossible, because charters, particularly cybers, are rolling in taxpayer dollars, and "fair funding" will mean "less revenue" for them. Whether it's paying cybers based, not on the actual costs, but on per-pupil costs of sending districts, or allowing charters to game the special ed system, charters are highly profitable in PA. Why does their happiness even matter? Because they are investing big bucks in Harrisburg lobbying.

Wolf spoke at Allentown, one of the PA school districts that has been absolutely hammered by charter costs (a problem across the state). We know he touched a nerve because Ana Meyers, the Tea Party former PR flak educational amateur who is the current executive director of the Pennsylvania Coalition of Public [sic] Charter Schools cranked her press release generator into High Dudgeon and complained about Wolf's "audacity" in denying families their choice blah blah zip code blah blah [insert tired charter rhetoric here]. It is the same old same old complaint and it comes without a single explanation of why it would limit family choice to make charters actually accountable to the taxpayers who foot the bill. This is the standard PA charter line every time laws come up-- anything that would fetter the charter freedom to do whatever they want, collect all the money they can, and not explain a single thing to the taxpayers whose money they take-- anything like that would "trap students in failing schools" and "limit the freedom of families." You would think that charter schools are so fragile and weak that the slightest legislative breath in their general direction would just kill them and not, say, require their owners to buy slightly smaller mansions or just generally be more efficient in their frauding. You might also get the impression that PA choice programs like our version of Tax Credit Scholarships were being used by poor families, and not just kicking bonuses back to the wealthy.

So, interesting times ahead. Let's hope that Wolf is actually able to pull this off and that Pennsylvania's eternal charter free ride is, if not ending, at least slowing down.

MI: Rural Charters, Warm Bodies, and the Effects of the Teacher "Shortage"

St. Helen, Michigan, has its share of problems. Founded as a logging community, it's Up North in Michigan. It's at least near the interstate, but the population is under 3,000, with a median family income of $30,268. They do have an annual bluegill festival, and Charlton Heston spent part of his childhood there. On the other hand, they're Number Two on the Roadsnacks list of Worst Small Towns in Michigan. Unemployment is a whopping 18.9%; poverty is at 31%. This summer the beaches at the lake have been closed down for bacteria.

Not actually a phys ed teacher

The town took another hit that started in 2008 when the Gerrish-Higgins School District wanted to raise some taxes to improve its buildings. St. Helen residents voted for the tax. Then the district was taken over by the Roscommon Area Public Schools and they marked the St. Helen Elementary School for closure, consolidating all their students into an elementary, middle and high school, all located in Roscommon.

Jennifer Jarosz had lived her whole live in St. Helen. She's the owner/operator of the Hen House Restaurant in St. Helen. She started up Rural Education Matters, and the community looked for ways to save their school, a critical part of the rural community. Initially, they could not find an authorizer, but in 2011 Jarosz was among those testifying before the House Education Committee hoping that the cap on Michigan charters would be lifted. Her work has earned her a spot on the Michigan Charter Schools Association board, an unusual presence among the usual collection of consultants, financiers and corporate profiteers.

This is a side effect of charter caps I'd never thought about, but if authorizers can only approve so many charters, the competition will be to see who can promise that authorizer the best return, and big corporate operations will squeeze out the Mom and Pop charters.

The cap was lifted, and St. Helen had their charter, initially for an elementary school, just down St. Helen Road from the Hen House, and named for St. Helen's most famous resident-- Charlton Heston Academy. It now covers K-12. They featured an extra long school day, and no three month summer vacation. Students have been traveling there from the surrounding rural areas, to the point that Charlton Heston Academy asked to be released from state regulations so that they could give preference to residents of St. Helen; Michigan charters must move to a lottery once they're full.

Yes, they indulge in some classic charter school baloney-- out in front they apparently have a sign that says "Tuition free..." and lists some other free things at the school. This is a lie. Like any charter, CHA is funded with taxpayer dollars. It's not free.

CHA has also become the largest employer in St. Helen, and that in itself is leading to other problems.

CHA has a teaching staff of over 40% substitute teachers.

This article features just one of the many (I'm not going to include her name-- you can find it easily enough, but I don't think the writer of this article was doing her any favors). She used to be a repo officer for a credit union. She applied to CHA to maybe be a payroll officer or office manager. They said, "Wouldn't you like to become a teacher?" So now she's teaching math. She says she loves it. She also says

If I would have went to school and came out at 24 to start teaching, I wouldn't have made it. You have to have life experience, you have to have backbone.

She also says:

I would say that [long-term subs and certified teachers] are absolutely equivalent. There’s a lot of misguided judgement from people because I didn’t go to school for teaching. I think they think we don’t deserve it. But I don’t think one’s better than the other.

And she also says this:

It (the test to become a certified teacher) doesn't say that you're going to be dealing with emotions. It's just, ‘Do I know how to add or multiply or do algebra in order to teach it to the kids?’ That's the smallest part of my job. The absolute smallest.

A first grade teacher with no teaching degree or credentials is asked what makes her feel she can teach first-graders without a teaching degree. She replies, "I'm passionate." And she was a preschool paraprofessional for a few years.

Long term subs in Michigan are only required to have 60 total college credits. CHA has the lowest student achievement (aka test scores) in their intermediate school district, which is unsurprising given the level of poverty in the district.

The superintendent (David Patterson, the registered agent of Champion Learning, LLC) says that while he would prefer to hire certified teachers, the subs are doing just as good a job as certified teachers-- "you can't tell the difference." Of course, at this point, many of the certified teachers at CHA are former subs who completed a crash-course, one-year-of-weekends program at Saginaw Valley State University. The math teacher quoted above, who should "have went to school" and who thinks content knowledge is a minor part of her job, is now a certified teacher via the SVSU program. The charter pays for the coursework in exchange for a three-year commitment to teach at the school. It may not be a great program, but it does cut fewer corners than Teach for America. Makes it about as good as the Relay GSE program, which is also baloney.

Patterson's background contains few surprises. He graduated from Roscommon High School and went to work as a social worker in both Michigan and Florida. He's been adjunct faculty at Davenport University, Henry Ford Community College, and the University of Phoenix. And he spent some time as a "school choice" advocate with The Center for Charter Schools at Central Michigan University. So when he says he can't tell the difference between a substitute teacher and a trained, certified teacher, I believe him.

Patterson says that "the issue" is not long term subs, but the "teacher shortage." On this, we agree. Well, sort of. There is no teacher shortage. Hell, there isn't even that much of a "shortage" in rural Michigan. Yes, Michigan has seen a big drop in teachers in the pipeline, but CHA is employing waaaay more substitutes than any other rural schools in the state.

But the narrative of a teacher shortage allows folks to justify all sorts of shenanigans. It lets teacher leaders pretend that there is some sort of teacher crop failure, an act of divine deprivation that they are helpless to address, so, hey, might as well just start grabbing warm bodies off the street or hitting up people who apply for other jobs entirely. As long as they have passion and really care hard, they'll be just like all the other fully trained teachers.

And what sucks more about this is that the students at this school are poor, rural students who really, really need a strong school with strong teachers. Particularly in Michigan, where the state court ruled that the state is under no obligation to provide students with an education that is actually any good. The students of St. Helen have been shafted in an unpleasant variety of ways over the past decade. I actually agree with the concept of a locally owned and operated charter school to replace what's been lost, but come on, folks-- that only works if you provide your students with a real school staffed with real teachers. CHA is all excited about the athletic facilities it's going to build when they need to be excited about the fact that they can't actually attract and keep the staff they need to run a real school.

ICYMI: Just A Quiet Day Edition (8/11)

Buying office supplies. Fretting about getting up in the morning. School must be getting closer-- but not too close yet. Have a cup of whatever you have cups of to relax, and take in some of the education reading from the last week. Don't forget to share the good stuff.

How much knowledge is necessary for comprehension?

You need some background knowledge in order to get better at reading (regardless of what you've been told about "skills"). Turns out there's even research about how much is the bare minimum requirement. Yes, it's from the Fordham blog, but I think it's worth reading, anyway.

Strategy Overdue for Special Ed  

Wendy Lecker, writing in the Register Citizen, looks at how lobbyists have made a mess out of Connecticut's special ed sector.

In PA, a Charter Rules Change To Benefit Just One School

WHYY uncovers a somewhat nuts story about political payback to benefit just one charter school. Because level playing field.  

7 Harsh Truths That Will Improve Your Leadership Skills Overnight

From Inc., this piece isn't education-specific, but both teachers and administrators could benefit from these pointers.

Inside the NAACP Civil War Over Charter Schools 

Yes, charter advocates have gone so far as to plant folks inside the NAACP in an attempt to weaken the organization's stance on charter schools. From Rebecca Klein at HuffPost.

Student Culture in Question  

From Colorado, yet another example of a charter school that uses its "flexibility" to shaft its employees.

Nick Hanauer and Diane Ravitch

Ex-reformster rich guy Hanauer stirred things up a few weeks ago with his piece in the Atlantic. Listen to his podcast talking to Diane Ravitch; there's some really good stuff here.

Problems with Midyear Admissions  

Matt Barnum at Chalkbeat looks at one more way that charters game the test results and avoid taking on some of the tougher challenges of education.

Florida Charters Can Reject Kids With Disabilities

The Orlando Sentinel just noticed one more way that Florida charter avoid providing an actual source of public education to all students.

How a Truly Epic Charter School Fraud Unfolded in Oklahoma  

And speaking of charter cheating, John Thompson is at the Progressive with an astonishing tale of how a truly ballsy piece of charter fraud was pulled off in plain sight.

New Orleans' Kennedy High School Grading Fiasco  

The indispensable Mercedes Schneider with the continuing story of how a NOLA charter has put the future of its students in jeopardy. Will anyone be held responsible?

This Teen Hacker Found Bugs In School Software That Exposed Millions of Records

Want one more story to make you anxious about the online work your students do? This Wired story is just the thing. This high school student didn't just find problems with obscure edusoftware-- he broke into Follett and Blackboard, then used them as doorways to millions of student records including grades, medical, schedules, cafeteria balance, photos, and more. And this was just what a bored, curious sixteen-year-old could do.

Reed Hastings: Stars In Every Position

We’re like a pro sports team, not a kid’s recreational team. Netflix leaders hire, develop and cut smartly, so we have stars in every position.

That's Reed Hastings in a 2009 interview about his then-juggernaut business, Netflix. I came across it recently and, because Hastings has approached education and charter schools with the same business attitude, hoping to turn charter schools into a Netflix-style success story, it seems worth doing a deep read.

This guy.

Hastings has had his hand in many charter pies, from backing outfits like Rocketship and KIPP, as well as serving on the board of California Charter Academy, a chain that collapsed mid-year, leaving 6,000 students high and dry to helping shape charter law in California. Hastings has also had a hand in the launch NewSchools Venture Fund, an investment group that backs ed tech and other edupreneurs. So we're not talking fringe player here.

So what do we discover in this quote?

First, the "pro sports team, not a kid's recreation team" aspect. A pro sports teams picks and chooses its players. A public school does not. Nor can a public school "cut" students who don't measure up.

"Stars in every position" is the same focus. In Hasting's mind, that may apply only to the staff and administration of a school, but people who actually work in education know that part of what creates the atmosphere and culture of a school is, in fact, the students. Would a school that has nothing but star pupils be a great school? Probably. The job in public education is to educate everyone, but what we see repeatedly with the corporate charter movement is schools that "fire" students and their families.

This is educational gentrification. Gentrification says, "This neighborhood is problematic. But we'll come in and replace the buildings with better buildings, the stores with better stores, the apartments with better apartments, and the residents with better residents." Gentrification is about swapping out everything except the latitude and longitude of the neighborhood. In the end, you haven't "improved" anything-- you've replaced everything.

You don't improve a school by replacing everything except the building (and maybe that as well)-- you've just replaced it, and that's no achievement.

I also wonder how far down the star system runs. Is everybody toiling away at minimum wage in the Netflix mail room a star? Or is Netflix just another tech firm like Amazon, built on the labor of anonymous overworked underpaid people who are beneath the notice of the big boys. And how could anyone possibly apply that approach to a school?

But there's something else to watch here, because there's a good argument to be made that Hastings is mostly falling victim to a post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy. That's the one that says, "I did A, and the B happened, so A must have caused B." I wore my ugly hat to a baseball game and my team didn't suck, therefor my hat made the team unsuck themselves.

Hasting's theories about why Netflix has been successful are going to be put to the test. As you may have heard, the streaming video world that Netflix has previously dominated is about to become much more crowded, with Disney and Warner Brothers pulling content from Hasting's business, and customers already jumping ship. Maybe Hasting's all star team will come up with a clever way to turn this around. Maybe free market competition is about to spur new heights of excellence. Or maybe Netflix is about to become the next Myspace-- first to the party, but not ultimately the dominant player.

In other words, maybe Hastings is not so much a business genius as he is a relatively smart guy was lucky enough to get in front of a wave just as it was starting to peak. Maybe his brilliant leadership and his selection of what he thinks are a bunch of all stars is not the secret of his success at all. Maybe the only lesson he has to teach is "Be lucky," which is not news to anybody (and is already the hiring process for many schools). Or maybe the lesson is that sometimes the free market eats its young and businesses go stumble and fall every day, leaving investors and employees adrift, which may be great for the world of visionary CEOs-- but it's a lousy way to run a public school system, a system which, after all, is not meant to serve just the stars, but everybody.