This tweet turned up the other day.
I interviewed a teacher who is leaving the profession in June. I asked her why she was quitting.— Fixing Education (@FixingEducation) March 9, 2020
“I was told to teach to the test...that if it’s not a test-taking skill, don’t teach it. I didn’t become a teacher to help kids become better test-takers.”#EdChat
I wish the teacher hadn't slipped into passive voice. I wish she had said, "Principal Testy McScoresuck told me to teach to the test." Because administrators like this need to be outed. They need to be held up before the world as people helping to facilitate the creeping educational malpractice rooted in high stakes testing.
NCLB, Race to the Top, Common Core, the high stakes Big Standardized Tests-- each of these bad policies is bad for many reason, but the biggest one is this: instead of helping teachers do their jobs, these policies interfere with teachers doing their jobs, even mandate doing their jobs badly. In each case a bunch of educational amateurs pushed their way into schools and said, "You're doing it all wrong from now on, you have to do it like this," like medically untrained non-doctors barging into a surgical procedure to say, "Stop using that sterile scalpel and use this rusty shovel instead."
That was bad. But it is base betrayal when, in that situation, management turns to its trained, professional workers and says, "Well, you heard the man. Pick up that rusty shovel."
NCLB and its "every student will be above average by 2014" was bullshit, and everyone in education knew it was bullshit, that by 2013 every school would be either failing or cheating, but too many school administrators didn't say, "You just do your job. I'm going to spend an hour of every day calling our legislators and explaining what bullshit this is." Instead too many said, "Look, here are some test practice books. We'll give some practice tests, identify the students who are close enough to drag over the line, keep our heads down, and maybe they'll fix the rules by the time it becomes hopeless." In other words, "You heard the man. Pick up the rusty shovel and at least pretend to use it."
By the time Common Core, Race to the Top waivers and waiver lite rolled around to ramp up the high stakes on the back end and attach amateur-hour standards on the front end, many administrators were already broken. Instead of "Oh, hey, wait a minute," they responded with "Well, maybe this will blow over" or "Nothing we can do about it but bend to the state" or "Get in there and teach to the test."
The argument has been that the federal and state authorities have mandated all of this, and in some states where test results have been used as a method of targeting public schools for destruction, the emphasis on the Big Standardized Test has been hard to avoid. In most states, the BS Test score has become part of every public school's profile, and it's hard to resist the urge to do something about going out in public with that big black eye.
I get all of that. I get the tremendous pressure that some administrators must feel to teach to the test. But it's still wrong. And when the rain starts, the role of a good manager is not to stand to one side and say, "Why the hell are you getting so wet, anyway?"
Administrators have offered a wide variety of responses over the years from the naive (Just teach the standards and the test scores will take care of themselves) to the heroic (Just do your job, and I'll manage whatever flak comes at us). And the same policy approach in a building can come with a variety of faces from sympathetic (I know this sucks, and I'm sorry) to abusive (Get your damn numbers up or I will be assigning you lunch monitor duty forever, you miserable slacker). Sometimes, of course, there are two or three faces involved in the same building.
Bottom line: when education policy is dictated from the top down, it often arrives at the classroom door wearing the face of the building administrator, and the amount of damage done by the bad policies of the last two decades has been affected, for better or worse, by district administrators.
A helpful post would be one that explains *how* someone would stand up to administration and not have a lot of unintended consequences be the result. The reason it doesn't happen enough is that it is very difficult to do successfully. Any suggestions would be helpful for people facing this dilemma. Most people see no other option but to walk away. Who wants or can afford to fight a losing battle?ReplyDelete
The answer is to take a stand against the tests - not the administrator. Become a conscientious objector in the testing wars against children. Take control of how and what you teach and never implement bad practices (test-prep), regardless of what an administrator directs you to do. Nod your head yes, close your door, and do what's best for your kids.Delete
Yes. How many people feel confident enough to do that, I wonder.Delete
Then you get the "walk throughs" to see if you are doing what you are supposed to do. I was too naive to know that know- nothing administrators were trolling my class and over ruling those who did know, but that was back in the "early days"(ten years ago) when I still assumed teaching required professional knowledge.ReplyDelete
Seems the school policies are in havoc all over the globe, Peter. The mindset of the administrative staff has become result-oriented. The teachers are struggling between teaching and following the rules set by the administration. Well, there is hardly anyone who cares about what the students are finally going to do.ReplyDelete