This is the least-read thing I've ever written for Forbes, but I still wonder about the issue. So let me put it out there again.
The expansion of Medicare coverage as a path to universal healthcare for the U.S. has unleashed a great deal of debate from think tanks to water coolers. One of the biggest questions remain—how much would it actually cost, and what would the average citizen pay?
The answer to the first question is “a whole lot (but remember--we currently pay a large number of whole lots. The second part-- well, there are many possible plans floating around at the moment. Some argue that the overall cost of healthcare in the U.S. would come down, meaning savings for some folks and fewer profits for others. The government costs would go way up, necessitating increased taxes for everyone. But, argue supporters, the increased tax burden would be offset by the end of deductibles and co-pays; there’s also the hope, under some versions, that employers would save on healthcare costs and some of those savings could be passed on as wage increases. Plus, the extra wrinkle that businesses would no longer be able to use health care as leverage against striking workers.
There is one other wrinkle that seems to draw little or no discussion.
Public school employees, like other citizens, get their healthcare from their employers. But unlike other citizens, public school employees have their healthcare paid for by taxpayers. According to the Kaiser Foundation, the cost of an employer-provided insurance policy has topped $20,000. District-provided insurance has stayed in that neighborhood. That means that in small a school district with just 200 employees, even if the district has been paying $15,000 per employee, Medicare-for-All could potentially provide as much as $3 million savings to local taxpayers. That could be immediately translated into lower real estate taxes, or higher wages or better facilities, or something.
One of the great sticking points for retirement is often how to cover insurance until the retiree is old enough for Medicare; this results in some pricey retirement incentive programs in some districts. Those could go away under Medicare-for-All, providing more savings to school district taxpayers.
There could be additional non-financial benefits as well. Contract negotiations often run aground over benefits, even as increased health insurance costs give teachers “invisible” raises (the school district spends more per teacher, but the teacher never sees it). Taking health insurance off the table could make contract negotiations just a bit easier and clearer.
Heaven only knows what Medicare-for-All (or Mostly-All) could eventually look like, nor what it would look like after it miraculously passed through the House and Senate, But an education bonus could be part of that picture, and with it, maybe even some real estate tax relief. It may not be a major feature of health care policy, but an instant couple of million being freed up is not nothing.
Not that is an interesting look at Medicare for all. I'd never even considered this aspect. Thanks for pointing it out.
ReplyDeleteThis is an obvious point - MFA/Single-Payer would save public employers money and make private businesses more competitive internationally. You'd be surprised at how many right-leaning folks still complained about this when I shared this posting on FB.
ReplyDeleteMedicare-for-All is a healthcare policy proposal that aims to provide universal healthcare coverage to all individuals, focusing on improving access to medical services and reducing healthcare costs. While it doesn't typically include a direct education bonus, its potential indirect impacts on education can be significant. By alleviating financial burdens, such as medical debt and high healthcare expenses, individuals would have more financial stability and resources to invest in education, including college tuition and vocational training. Additionally, the implementation of Medicare-for-All could streamline medical billing services, simplifying the administrative processes and reducing the burden on healthcare providers. This could contribute to overall cost savings in the healthcare system and potentially benefit education by redirecting resources to educational programs and initiatives. Ultimately, while the primary goal of Medicare-for-All is healthcare coverage, its implementation can indirectly benefit education by enhancing individuals' financial well-being and opportunities for educational advancement, as well as improving efficiency in medical billing services. For more information plz visit our
ReplyDeletewebsite:https://prgmd.com/medical-billing-services/
Medicare-for-All is a healthcare policy proposal that aims to provide universal healthcare coverage to all individuals, focusing on improving access to medical services and reducing healthcare costs. While it doesn't typically include a direct education bonus, its potential indirect impacts on education can be significant. By alleviating financial burdens, such as medical debt and high healthcare expenses, individuals would have more financial stability and resources to invest in education, including college tuition and vocational training. Additionally, the implementation of Medicare-for-All could streamline medical billing services, simplifying the administrative processes and reducing the burden on healthcare providers. This could contribute to overall cost savings in the healthcare system and potentially benefit education by redirecting resources to educational programs and initiatives. Ultimately, while the primary goal of Medicare-for-All is healthcare coverage, its implementation can indirectly benefit education by enhancing individuals' financial well-being and opportunities for educational advancement, as well as improving efficiency in medical billing services.
ReplyDeletehttps://prgmd.com/medical-billing-services/