Monday, July 29, 2024
Godspeed, Coach Stewart
Sunday, July 28, 2024
ICYMI: Surprise, Surprise Edition (7/28)
It’s Time to End Federal Funding for Reckless For-Profit Charter Schools
What's Ryan Walters really want, because all he's doing now is getting ignored?
Tuesday, July 23, 2024
Say No To VP Shapiro
Josh Shapiro has been a swell governor of Pennsylvania, certainly far superior to some of the far right wingnuts that we've had running in this state. But word is out today that he's on the Very Short List for the Kamala Harris VP, and all I can say is, I sure hope they don't pick him.
Shapiro has a good ear for many things, and as governor has gotten stuff done in a state where we often find a Democratic governor and a GOP-dominated legislature looked in paralytic embrace. He fixed a bridge--quickly. Even the right-tilted Washington Examiner said he "met the moment" after the attempted assassination of Donald Trump.
But when it comes to school vouchers, he is not a public school supporters dream.
He hasn't been shy about it. He ran on a platform that included explicit support for school vouchers, explicit in favoring the super-vouchers that Pennsylvania's GOP has been pushing for years.
Josh favors adding choices for parents and educational opportunity for students and funding lifeline scholarships like those approved in other states and introduced in Pennsylvania.
His education transition team included several choicers, including Amy Sichel, the superintendent who drew flak for selling naming rights for a high school to Donald Trump buddy Stephen Schwarzman, and Joel Greenberg, co-founding partner of Susquehanna International Group with Jeff Yass, Pennsylvania's most well-heeled deep pocketed activist for school vouchers.
The state Democratic Party was on the verge of telling him to back off the vouchers, but then they decided that just wasn't as important as other stuff.School privatizers worked out a bill that they thought would provide Shapiro sufficient political cover, meeting his requirement that it wouldn't take money from public schools (spoiler alert: it totally would), then were Very Upset when Shapiro decided not to sign off on that voucherpalooza.
However, Shapiro immediately signaled that his voucher love was still strong and that he still wants to find a way to make it happen. In the meantime, he threw choice a bone by giving supporters a chance to "improve" the state charter board. And his crew went ahead and approved a new cyber-charter when there was every reason in the world to say no.
Look, it's not as if he's been sneaky or underhanded about his voucher love, but it's also not as if he's shown openness to consider evidence that his affection might be misplaced. Meanwhile, other governors like Governors Roy Cooper (North Carolina), Andy Beshear (Kentucky), Gretchen Whitmer (Michigan), and Tim Walz (Minnesota) have stood up for public education in their states (yes, they're not all available, but they are proof that such defenders exist).
The state Dems were willing to throw public education under the bus, and I don't expect much better from the national party. But it would be nice. It would be nice to have the nation's top spots occupied by solid supporters of public education who oppose privatization, who did not calculate that education is one place where they can just go ahead and adopt a slightly watered down version of right-wing policy, who did not embrace the kind of neo-liberal baloney that we've suffered under in previous administrations.
The push to privatize education has never pushed harder, and public education has never been more in need of a champion at the highest level. Josh Shapiro is not that champion.
Sunday, July 21, 2024
Where's My Bubble?
We just took a quick day trip with the board of directors to an amusement park, one that has become a favorite of mine after roughly 17,000 excursions there as a class trip chaperone. One small incident reminded me of one reason we are having a moment about vouchers and choice in this country.
To understand the story, let me tell you a few things about regular life for the board of directors. The twins are now 7 and get very little screen exposure. In the summer, they get one "show" each on a daily basis (less during school). They don't have devices of their own, and they don't get to share ours. They do have screen time at school. But they are used to watching shows from tv or disc. Also, they are very accustomed to hearing some version of "no."
So. We booked a hotel room for the night before. When we're doing longer traveling, we usually have a laptop with us, which, time permitting, let's them have a daily show. But this time we didn't. All we had was the cable for the hotel tv.
They were absolutely baffled. Why could we not just watch their shows? Why wouldn't we pull up Netflix? Why was this program in the middle and what did we mean, we couldn't just go back to the beginning and start over?
None of this was angry or entitled, but about 1 part bemusement and 2 parts frustration with the grownups who were not smart enough to make things work the way they are obviously supposed to.
We have raised and are raising generations of citizens who are used to living in a bubble, a bubble in which they control most of what goes on, how it goes on, when it goes on.
I have used before my tales of being a band bus chaperone and the effects of technology on shared space. Ages ago, the inside of a band bus was a shared space, as exemplified by the music. Ages ago, you got whatever the driver picked up (or could pick up) on the radio. Then debates over what tape to play. The use of boom boxes to break the space into smaller spaces. And finally, we arrive at the age of walkmans and ipods, in which what was once shared space is not shared at all.
Most of our popular culture in the 20th century was shared space. If you skip Super-Bowls and political debates, all of the most viewed episodes on tv are from at least thirty years ago; an entire generation has grown up with no idea of what Must-See TV is.
I'm not waving my old man fist at technoclouds. Things change. But I do think that sometimes we overestimate the power of deep policy decisions and the long slow game for school choice and the privatization of education and underestimate the degree to which a generation has been affected by growing up in their own individual bubbles.
Of course, the thing about bubbles is that they're fueled by available choices, and has always been true, the number of choices you have available is directly proportional to the amount of money you have to spend on them. Bubbles favor the haves way more than the have-nots; in fact, bubbles are often about the haves keeping the have-nots out.
Nor do I think society benefits from a shortage of shared spaces. But shared spaces are at odds with the commercial, mercenary consumer mindset, a mindset that encourages us to scrimp and save and hoard the resources we need to make ourselves the best damned bubble ever. Gimme my fully furnished neo-liberal bubble, baby.
Robert Putnam in The Upswing suggests that maybe we will figure out the value of shared spaces and bounce back. And maybe we will be moved by the loneliness of tiny gods; certainly the signs are that we are feeling it. Lots of folks like to point at social media and smartphones as culprits, and I have long resisted that notion because I have witnessed what a huge connective power that social media exerts, how it allows people to stay in contact with a myriad of human beings. But it does so as part of the process of building that bubble, and I think that bubble, that lack of time spent in shared spaces, is the more likely culprit in the steadily worsening mental health of younger generations (as well as, suggests Hannah Arendt, the growing attraction to totalitarianism).
Public schools have been one of the great shared spaces in this country, shared not only because every child goes there, but because every taxpayer participates and contributes.
Preserving them as a shared space is crucial to our collective health. Some public school defenders link public schools to democracy, both as contributor and benefactor, but I think the issue is deeper than that, more fundamental our health as human beings. We need shared space to be fully, healthily human, even if we have to share that space with people with whom we disagree. Maybe even especially if we have to share the space with those people.
How to do this when so much of the tide is sweeping away shared spaces? How to make the argument to folks whose position is a simple, dispassionate "Why should I have this particular feature in my world when I don't want to and I don't have to?"
There is a big bundle of questions to solve here, and I don't take them as simple theoreticals, because my sons and my grandchildren are the people who are growing up needing the answers, who are having their shared spaces devoured out from under them, and I worry about them reaching the point when their bubble is not a preference, but a necessity.
ICYMI: Fun Field Trip Week Edition (7/21)
The Chief Marital Officer of the Institute took a couple of days this week to adventure with me. We even took the Board of Directors on one trip (details to come). Our anniversary was this week, so we were involved in some mild adventures preparatory to vacation, which is coming up soon.
But there are still things to read, so here's your list for the week.
Ohio Charter Schools Still StruggleOhio Seems to Be Throwing Away Public Education, Arguably America’s Most Important Institution
How do you really know if data-driven policies and outcomes are accurate?
School Vouchers Were Supposed to Save Taxpayer Money. Instead They Blew a Massive Hole in Arizona’s Budget.
Tuesday, July 16, 2024
KY: Vouchers Would Be Bad News, Says Study
No sum shall be raised or collected for education other than in common schools until the question of taxation is submitted to the legal voters, and the majority of the votes cast at said election shall be in favor of such taxation
Voucher thought they had circumvented the problem by using tax credit scholarships, and the attorney general led the defense of the vouchers with the old "the money is never actually in the government's hands" argument. The court was unimpressed. “The money at issue cannot be characterized as simply private funds,” they wrote, “rather it represents the tax liability that the taxpayer would otherwise owe.”
Deputy Chief Justice Lisabeth T. Hughes wrote “Simply stated, it puts the Commonwealth in the business of raising sum(s) . . . for education other than in common schools.”The General Assembly may provide financial support for the education of students outside the system of common schools.
Pick yes or no.
Now a new report from the Kentucky Center for Economic Policy lays out just how expensive a "yes" would be.
"The Impact of Diverting Public Money to Private School Vouchers in Kentucky" is deep and thorough and with more than enough charts and graphs to warm the wonky heart. But its findings are clear and cause for alarm.The report points out that in other voucher states, 65%-90% of the taxpayer-funded vouchers go to families that already have their children in private schools, and that in Kentucky, that group has an average household income 54% higher than public school families. Even if you think the wealthy have a right to be subsidized by the taxpayers (including the less wealthy ones), that group represents an expansion in the number of students using taxpayer dollars, a dramatic expansion of education costs.
The cost of all this will hit rural and poor areas hardest, because they are the ones most dependent on state support, which will be reduced by the voucher program. At the same time, since few rural areas have private schools available, the voucher dollars will represent money leaving the community entirely.
Meanwhile, in populous counties, vouchers will increase the total cost of education in the area. Public schools will retain stranded costs (heating costs don't shrink just because you have fewer students) and parallel school systems will duplicate administrative costs. There's a reason that school districts trying to cut costs close buildings rather than opening new ones.
The report nails the bottom line pretty effectively.
If Amendment 2 passes, it will upend Kentucky’s longstanding constitutional commitment to public education and result in legislation that diminishes public schools across the commonwealth. The amendment will widen the growing divides that are already weakening Kentucky communities and hinder education’s role in fostering the healthy democracy necessary for every Kentuckian to thrive.
Let's hope the voters of Kentucky heed the warning.
Sunday, July 14, 2024
ICYMI: Horrific Violence Edition (7/14)
If we should have learned anything else in the past couple of decades, it's that leaping in quickly with comments and reactions before the smoke has cleared is a mistake, so I try to keep my mouth shut, but I will say this-- I have no love or respect for Trump, but this was terribly, deeply wrong.
The shooting hits hard here-- Butler is in my neck of the woods, a quick 40-mile jaunt up the road. We go there for some Red Lobster now and then. It's a small city, very much the kind of place that you would not expect something like this to happen.
Meanwhile, the story I was going to lead with took place in the next county over from Butler. A teenaged trans girl was found horribly murdered; a suspect is in custody. I would not have caught the story except for a message posted by Bishop Sean Rowe (currently newly elected top bishop of Episcopal church, formerly the priest at my own local Episcopal church). It's a terrible, brutal story.
I'm not a fan of critically acclaimed shows about horrible people doing horrible things' The world doesn't really need any more of that; certainly not in real life. I am grateful that in the education biz, we mostly don't have to spend a lot of time arguing about who does or does not deserve to be murdered. Mostly.
It's Sunday and my regular promise is a reading list and not a homily, so here you go.
Florida Department of Education includes Jane Austen novel in ‘American Pride’ recsPROOF POINTS: Asian American students lose more points in an AI essay grading study — but researchers don’t know why
If the governor of Florida can, by the power not vested in him, unilaterally declare that the church of Satan isn’t a religion, then he can also wake up one morning and decide that Islam isn’t a religion, or Hinduism, or Catholicism or any faith that allows women to preach or doesn’t handle snakes.Project 2025: Ending Public Education for Students with Disabilities