“I would say that we live in a democracy, and part of the responsibility of being a parent is to do your own research,” the health secretary said, in response to a question from a woman in the audience who asked how he would advise a new parent about vaccine safety. “You research the baby stroller, you research the foods that they’re getting, and you need to research the medicines that they’re taking as well.”
"Do your own research" is supposed to ring with independence and a refusal to blindly follow the sheeple, combined with an implicit claim that your google search is probably just as good as what those so-called experts tell you.
But what I really hear in this exchange is a rejection of collective responsibility. "Can you help me make a safe choice for my child?" the young mother asks. "Not going to do it," replied the damned Secretary of Health and Human Services of the richest nation in the history of the world. "Your kid is not my problem. Your kid is not anyone else's problem. Go figure it out yourself."
This has always been the message of the school voucher movement since those long-ago days when Milton Friedman dreamed of a country where education was just one more commodity in a government-free marketplace. "Go get an education for your kid yourself. It's nobody else's problem, nobody else's concern, nobody else's responsibility. Here's a little voucher; now shut up and go away."
This is the Big Theme of MAGA/Trump/DOGE/Etc-- "We are tired of being told we have to care about other people." That's it. That's the whole thing. "I don't want to have to spend a cent of my money on anyone who isn't me." From the DOGE non-saving inefficient roll-back of anything the government does that involves looking out for other people (including collecting information that could help them make decisions) all the way to J D Vance's bizarre claim that Jesus says the further away from you someone is, the less Jesus wants you to love them.
In fact, not only would they like to not have their money taken to spend on other people, but maybe they can get some of other people's money to spend on themselves.
They can always draw a crowd of people who believe in the legitimate concerns-- government is too often inefficient and wasteful, being free to make choices is good, public schools have too often failed some students-- but those folks rarely get to drive the bus because they never think it would go So Far and going So Far is what the actual drivers intended from the start.
"Do your own research" because nobody else is going to do it, and if you don't have the resources, well, don't worry about it because I'm sure whatever you do will be just as good as any scientist or expert or teacher would come up with. The important part is that you do the science, health, and education research yourself. And if this bold new do-it-yourself approach means that society is sorted into different tiers and classes based on who has the most resources to take care of themselves, well, that's how God meant it to be. The social safety net and government-supported programs have just been a means to lift up people (with my damn money) when those folks should be staying in their proper places, cranking out babies to serve as future meat widgets for our wealthy leaders (who are wealthy and leaders because of their demonstrated merit).
For MAGA, the DeVos's, the Kochtopus, and the rest of that crowd, public schools are just one more way that dollars are stolen to try to lift the lessers out of their proper place in society. It's the businesses, the corporations, that deserve the support and assistance of the government. For individual persons? Do your own research, do your own science, do your own educating-- because the regime is tired of helping take care of you, and they are trying to convince us that disregard is freedom.
It is fascinating to hear you describe how other people think about the "lessers". Reminds me of a professor I had at the University of Illinois, Urbana Champaign who was teaching the plays of Bertolt Brecht. When one student (who happened to personally hail from from the "lesser" category --your term) shared a comment about a certain character's motivations that contradicted his analysis of the play, he slammed his fist down in the table and shouted, "This is why we shouldn't teach these topics to undergraduates!". Despite her solidly blue collar, low income, single parent and first generation American life experience, she was not qualified to assess characters depicted by solidly middle class playwright taught a solidly middle class professor. If someone wants to talk "class" and motivation, it seems the educated and academics have the final word.
ReplyDeleteHighly informative post. Will share.
I do my best to analyze what I see and hear of their expression of their ideas. I'm not sure anyone is ever entitled to the final word.
DeleteWhat was your reaction to Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson's comment that if parents don't like the books being used in public schools they take their kids out of public schools and homeschool them? I was half expecting to see a post about that.
ReplyDeleteIt was an odd comment to make for several reasons, not the least of which is that homeschooling is a luxury not available to all. But at the end of the day, as prolific as I may be, I can't get to posting about everything. Some things I just tuck away till later, for context.
Delete