Sunday, January 4, 2026
ICYMI: Back To It Edition (1/4)
Thursday, January 1, 2026
The Sad Gift of 2025
Tuesday, December 30, 2025
AI Makes Strange Bedfellows
Representing parents across the nation, she expressed support for the responsible use of artificial intelligence as a tool to enhance educational outcomes, while also emphasizing parents’ serious concerns about rushed implementation without appropriate safeguards and guardrails in place.
Well, yes, that's...um...correct.
Meanwhile, Politico's Andrew Atterbury covered Ron DeSantis's very crabby opposition to AI.
“Let’s not try to act like some type of fake videos or fake songs are going to deliver us to some kind of utopia,” the governor said Dec. 18.
He notably has taken aim at data centers sprouting up across the country by attempting to slow their growth in Florida, siding with local communities opposing the massive developments. And DeSantis frequently raises fears of how AI could ultimately upend the economy by displacing countless workers. The Republican rails against what he calls the “mindless slop” AI creates and warns deepfakes and manipulation could pose “a potential existential crisis for self-government.”
“The idea of this transhumanist strain, that somehow this is going to supplant humans and this other stuff, we have to reject that with every fiber of our being,” DeSantis said Dec. 15 during an AI event in Jupiter. “We as individual human beings are the ones that were endowed by God with certain inalienable rights. That's what our country was founded upon — they did not endow machines or these computers for this.”
Okay, a little christiniast nationalismy for me, but basically, I think he's right.
And here's NPR, running the Ai resistance banner up the flagpole that is Keri Rodrigues, the leader of the astroturfed National Parents Union. She found her son interacting with the chatbot on his Bible app. He was asking deep moral questions about sin and stuff. Author Rhitu Chatterjee sets her irony ignorer on stun and writes
That's the kind of conversation that she had hoped her son would have with her and not a computer. "Not everything in life is black and white," she says. "There are grays. And it's my job as his mom to help him navigate that and walk through it, right?"
She's not wrong (she's just a bad spokesperson for moral complexity and nuance).
It feels a little reminiscent of the Common Core days, when the opposition include a coalition of people who were against the Core because they wanted to defend public schools and those who were against the Core because they considered it the ultimate example of everything Terrible and Wrong about public schools.
And just to ramp up that sense of deja vu, here comes the AFT to team up with our AI overlords to spend $23 million on teaching teachers to use AI. Or maybe you caught AFT chief Randi Weingarten's Christmas posts on the twitter and ye blue skye-- some lovely arts from the plagiarism and lies machine. Sigh. AFT has displayed some caution about AI in classrooms, and Weingarten has been crystal clear about her opposition to Trump's order to keep states from passing any sort of AI rules.
Lots of smart folks are predicting (even more) AI backlash in 2026, so maybe the right wing outrage crowd is simply angling to get in front of what they believe will be the next big fifteen-minute wave.
Whatever the case, these folks who are so reliably on the wrong side of so many education issues are, on this issue, are better on AI, or at least are saying some of the right words. Can they keep it up even as Trump continues to argue for unfettered, unregulated AI, including a federal attempt to forbid states to exercise their rights to regulate a business. Because if Dear Leader can do anything, it's sense where a whole lot of money is about to be thrown around so that he can insert himself into the transaction. States' rights? Who cares. 2026 could be an interesting year.
OK: OU Earns Failing Grade
Samantha Fulnecky is an American hero. She stood firm in her faith despite the radical attacks from the Marxist professors at the University of Oklahoma. The OU staff involved should be immediately fired and OU should not be receiving taxpayer dollars if they continue their assaults on faith. The war on Christianity is real, and we will not be silenced.
Other instructors backed up Curth's judgment, but the University folded like a wine-soaked paper bag, posting its statement on Twitter, just in case you were wondering to whom they feel answerable. They had already canceled the grade, removing any accountability for Fulnecky. Now they've decided that Curth's grade was "arbitrary" and Curth "will no longer have instructional duties at the University."
There's some more noise about how seriously they take student and faculty rights and academic freedom and integrity and it is meaningless, because the university has show exactly where it stands.
Deeply concerning? How do you enter a classroom to teach knowing that any 19-year-old who skips the reading, gets caught bluffing the assignment, and who cried religious victimization can end your teaching career?
There are difficult conversations and decisions to be made in the area where academic freedom and personal conviction bump up against each other, but this was not one of them. The correct decision should have been easy to make, and OU somehow managed to blow it anyway. Shame.
Sunday, December 28, 2025
OH: An Unfunded Tutoring Mandate
The Ohio legislature is considering a bill that will require schools to provide students with free "high-dosage tutoring" that will be subject to Department of Education and Workforce auditing along with a new professional development program for math teachers. The legislators have not included funding for any of this. Not a cent. It is the very definition of an unfunded mandate.
As reported by Laura Hancock at Cleveland.com:
“Our educational system must be responsive to the needs of our students,” bill sponsor Sen. Andrew Brenner, a Delaware County Republican, said earlier this year during bill testimony. “In this last year alone, we have significantly increased the amount of funding each student receives for their education, provided resources for tutoring services, and made high quality instructional materials available while identifying methods of instruction that most benefit students. If we are unable to say that our students who need the most help are in fact receiving that assistance from their school, then we are putting the interests of adults ahead of the needs of children.”
Lordy, it's like a word salad made out of some of the most popular baloney talking points. "Putting the interests of adults ahead of the needs of children." You know, like teachers with their need to be paid for extra hours of work. Mind you, putting the needs of adult politicians to look like they're bravely Doing Something about education ahead of actually supporting that education-- that kind of adults-first posturing is perfectly okay.
Brenner was a realtor and insurance salesman before he ascended to the legislature in 2019. He has a Masters in Ed in Leadership from far-right Christian nationalist Liberty University. In 2020, he warned that the state was going to become Nazi Germany over the Covid rules.
The bill at least exempts schools from providing these services for IEP students.
But it assumes that high-dosage tutoring is a real thing, without noting that it is hard and expensive to scale up.
This is the story of education a million times-- some legislator gets a bright idea and declares "Let's require schools to fix this" while waving vaguely in the direction of schools. And while this bright idea may require more resources and human-hours, that lawmaker will be confident that this whole new program can be implemented for free. Rick Hess has often said that you can force folks to do something, but you can't force them to do it well. That is doubly true when you make zero effort to provide them with the resources needed to implement the program.
Doesn't matter. Lawmakers will sign the bill (already through the Senate and headed through the House) and congratulate themselves on solving an education problem. For those who, like many Ohio legislators, would like to gut public education, the school's failure to do a great job implementing the unfunded mandate is just more fodder for the "We gave them money and they didn't perform magical pedagogical feats" argument used to discredit and dismantle public schools.
Would more no-cost tutoring be great? Sure, though I'd rather it were employed in a more useful cause than raising Big Standardized Test scores. And if you are undertaking a program that essentially increases the number of teacher hours in a day while simultaneously lowering the student-teacher ratio--well, if you are at all serious about it, you come armed with a big pile of money.
The Ohio legislature is not serious about this, but it will be a serious problem for schools.
But hey-- they're probably pre-occupied with the question of whether or not the state will be allowed to buy the obscenely wealthy owners of the Browns a new stadium with $600 million of taxpayer money. Gotta focus on important stuff that deals with the real interests of adults.
ICYMI: Top Tenless Edition (12/28)
Thursday, December 25, 2025
Merry Christmas Music
We started the day really early here at the Institute, where the Board of Directors is extremely excited about the day and are quite certain that it actually starts at 12:01 AM. I'm not a nap guy, but today...
Here is the annual version of my Youtube Christmas play list, which tries to center stuff that you haven't already heard a gazillion times.



