Pages

Friday, October 14, 2022

"It's about the passion, not about the paper"

That exceptionally silly quote is from Robert Abel, the Dallas schools Chief of Human Capital Management (a silly job title). It comes from an AP article about the growing move to "ease job requirements" for teachers in many states. You will be unsurprised to learn that Abel has never taught in a classroom; he graduated with a BA in molecular biology and was, somehow, a Vice Principal in DeSoto, TX, three years later. 

But let's not pick on Abel, who simply articulated an idea that is not uncommon. Teaching is all about passion and being called and just, you know, caring real hard. Lots of folks are spouting this line these days, including, unfortunately, people who think they are supporting teachers. But if all it takes is passion, well, then, anybody can be a teacher. Anybody at all.

Doesn't that make sense?

I've been dragged into court. Don't get me one of those lawyers who has gone to school and studied and practice law for years--just get me someone who's passionate about courtrooms and lawsuits and stuff. 

My beloved partner needs a major operation on their spleen. Don't get me one of those surgeons who just has a bunch of papers from some med school--just get me someone who's passionate about spleens and cutting things. 

I mean, we have shortages to deal with. There's a nursing shortage--let's just start hiring people who are passionate about being around sick people. There's a truck driver shortage, but hey--let's just issue big rig licenses to anyone who has ever driven any vehicle and is passionate about traveling. There's a rural doctor shortage--let's just let anyone who's really passionate about working with sick people be a doctor. And there's actually a plumber shortage--let's just hire someone who's passionate about water to do the job.

What could possibly go wrong?

This is the same kind of baloney that some people spew about art, that one just has to feel real hard and art pops out, as if there is not a world of technique and skill and study and practice required to enable that artful popping. 

This is not about "easing job requirements." It's about redefining the job and thereby expanding the candidate pool. Ray Kroc did this for McDonalds by redefining "cook" as "somebody who flips a switch, drops a fry basket, and assembles a product according to instructions." Redefining the job gets you a larger candidate pool, which in turn lowers the cost of hiring or replacing people--you know, that pesky human capital. 

"Passion not paper" doesn't even make sense in this context, because people who are passionate about a pursuit generally direct that passion into action and study and growth. Imagine someone who says, "I am really passionate about playing the trombone, but I don't ever actually do it." 

Teach for America was founded on the premise of "passion not paper," except that only a small percentage of its temp workforce was actually passionate about teaching (as opposed to, say, being passionate about building their resume), and you can spot those people because they actually stayed and did the work to become real teachers. 

So I'm not sure exactly what slice of human capital Abel is talking about, which persons are out there saying, "I am really passionate about teaching, but I have not taken any steps in my life to pursue that passion." If someone tells you, "I feel very passionate about you, but not enough to call or see you or listen to you or spend time with you," are you thinking that person is relationship material?

Look, I'm not about to defend the current teacher prep pipeline as a flawless source of training. Some college teacher prep programs are crap. I also recognize that some schools (like the one in the story that hasn't had a qualified math teacher for a year) face dire situations that demand some kind of solution right now. I believe that programs that create a path for people who have worked in schools as support personnel and have come to love and respect the work can be a plus. And I have known second-career teachers who were good.

Does passion matter? Sure. It's passion that fuels the engine that gives you the strength to power through the hard work, the long practice, the deep study, the acquisition of skill, the will to navigate the crappy days--all the things that get you the paper. Passion, by itself, is not enough.

But I also know that (as the article acknowledges) the new bunch of unqualified pseudo-teachers are not going to end up in schools filled with students from wealthy white families. Redefining the teaching profession so that any warm body can be placed in a classroom is going to have negative effects (exacerbated because these unqualified warm bodies tend to have a high rate of turnover), and those negative effects are going to be felt by students on the bottom end of the socio-economic scale, the students who already get the short end of the stick. They don't need passion and heart and gooey excuses--they need people who know what the hell they're doing and can do it well.


4 comments:

  1. A 'BA' in Molecular Biology? Wow! Since when is that field an 'Art'? Was a time not long ago when Molecular Biology was a graduate-school science. Does this guy actually have such a degree, or is he a total fake?

    But, this could explain his proposal to supplant people who have real experience with fakes. I must say, however, that despite having credentials, it did take me a few years to hone my message. And, I never stopped learning from my students.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Odd, I 'published' but it appears the comment was immediately trashed.

    Let me try again. Molecular Biology is usually a Graduate School science (or Med. School) specialty. Having a 'BA' in Molecular Biology seems really fishy to me.

    ReplyDelete
  3. We all lose under these circumstances - first the poor districts and then the wealthier ones as more and more people decide that teaching, though they may love it, is not for them. Why? Because those really passionate to teach see their expertise dismissed and belittled.

    There are many districts with school boards elected to office for the sole purpose of cut funding to education to lower taxes, not by a desire to provide their citizens with the best education possible by hiring high quality, thinking professionals. In addition, today, many politicians are so completely invested in upending public education that teachers are losing more and more of their ability to teach what they know they should to give the next generation the knowledge they need to become fully functioning citizens in a democracy.

    ReplyDelete
  4. First, Nora, I am 'Daedalus' (above in thread), however I can't seem to figure out how to sign in as such.

    Secondly, I totally agree with you. There are still empathic people who love to pass on their areas of interest to the next generation, however they have been systematically 'dissed'. Those people can only take so much.

    However, the way things are going (I'm old), it appears that today's students don't have to worry about being "functioning citizens in a democracy" unless they move to some other country (and democratic countries are becoming almost extinct even in Europe). I'm rather cynical, as you can tell.

    What can we do to get 'OUR' country back? Who knows? We seem to be ruled by money, now. Perhaps the best we can do is foment a revolution, or save one or two students who will pass on their vision throughout the coming Dark Ages. We can only do what we can.

    ReplyDelete