Catalyze Challenge: Throwing Money At Edupreneurs

It's another one of those things that helps you realize that some reformsters are operating in just another world entirely.

Meet the Catalyze Challenge. It's a grant competition that "supports innovation in career-connected learning that meaningfully bridge education and career." Its analysis of the need is the same old same old-- "Ourt education system promises economic opportunity for all--but right now, too many students graduate high school and college without the resources, skills, and support to thrive in their careers."

Press about the initiative says it's about how "to help foster new learning models." The idea is to fund "education entrepreneurs" aka education flavored businesses. And if we look at the funders--well, it's a familiar roster.

Sponsoring partners are the Joyce Foundation, the Walton Family Foundation, the Charkes Koch Foundation, and American Student Assistance. Koch has loaned Brennan Brown, their director of Education Partnerships, as an advisor. Brown's previous education experience is teaching at Northwood University for a decade. Northwood is located in Midland, Michigan; they're home to the DeVos Graduate School of Management and annually award the Richard DeVos Young Entrepreneur Award to honor the Amway founder who was "a true friend of Northwood University."

The challenge has two tracks. For Accelerate Award you can score up to half a million dollars; the Ignite Award goes up to $50K. There's a lot of talk about unlocking career success for students, equity, scalability, career identity development, post-high school pathways, and being groundbreaking (at one point the term "moonshot" crops up.

The implementing partners include good old NewVentureFund, a kind of venture philanthropy/lobbying/consulting supposedly-left-tilted outfit, connected to The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and considered by some to be a dark money group, and they appear to indulge in plenty of the same sort of faux group and astro-turfy sponsorship we know and love from other sources, and they themselves come under the umbrella of DC-base Arabella Advisors.

But the lead operational group appears to be Common Group, a "social impact consulting firm." They partner with groups including the Charter School Growth Fund, The Walton Foundation, Education Quality Outcomes, Christensen Institute, and, of course, the Charles Koch Foundation. Their team rings all the familiar bells. Alicia Bolton, the Program Manager is a product of the Broad Academy and worked in the Obama/Duncan Ed Department before becoming the Director of Caree Education in DC schools.  The Principal, Colleen Miner,  spent three years at McKinsey. Senior Advisor Rachel Wexler lists herself on LinkedIn as a "social impact consultant, change agent, and executive coach; she's worked for Penn Foster Education and Pearson. CEO George Vinton started out as a Client Director for Unipart Expert Practices (consulting firm) before getting a Masters in Education at Harvard and starting Common Group in September of 2020, in San Francisco.

There are a thousand rabbit holes to go down here, but the pattern is already there. The usual reformster social engineering philanthropy along with entrepreneurs, venture capitalists, professional consultants and people who think that someone can be unironically called a Change Agent.

This is the second round of these awards. School districts are allowed to apply, but in fifteen previous winners there are no public schools in sight. There are three initiatives for using digital remote materials to rural schools including the Crowder College initiative to "reshape the narrative about career opportunities in rural America to include a flourishing digital workforce"), a couple of IT programs (one provides BlPOC students a chance to "get real-world experience doing web development and social media marketing for mission-driven organizations), some tech-based interny things, and lots of tech-based distance programs. Lots and lots of computer technology based stuff, much of it connected to a particular geographic area, and some of it looking suspiciously like elevated language wrapped around fairly pedestrian and redundant programs; a couple of these sound suspiciously like "We'll give them some software that lets them look up different careers." 

But then, that's the kind of stuff when you have a pile of money driven by people who don't actually know much at all about K-12 education, and/or are most interested in pushing ideas of their own, and who harbor the underlying bias the public education needs to be hit by "break things and move fast" rather than reinforced and supported, that the solution for educational progress must somehow be wrapped in the entrepreneurial spirit. 

This is just a sample of what's out there, and probably not the most harmful thing that anyone is pushing, but a couple of million dollars represents a pretty large opportunity cost. After all these years, you'd think they would get better at throwing money around, but the signs are not good.