tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6534665086749553287.post3011030865043043573..comments2024-03-28T11:57:21.902-04:00Comments on CURMUDGUCATION: Brookings Fails To Makes Case For Annual TestingPeter Greenehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16511193640285760299noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6534665086749553287.post-930337505254656162015-01-11T11:56:25.955-05:002015-01-11T11:56:25.955-05:00Dienne, Deliberate edit of the words high stakes i...Dienne, Deliberate edit of the words high stakes is the rollout of (their line in the sand) of maintaining annual tests. Brookings is the whisper call to "progressives" of what is the nonnegotiable. That is my take. Without annual, comparable (who cares if it's faulty data) their is no new testing, data gathering, tracking industry and splinter companies going public on the Wall Street ticker tape. Fake food never stopped Monsanto monopoly, fake data is the same to Corporate Ed.<br />Laurahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00769822507255474529noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6534665086749553287.post-8413231231412460342015-01-10T08:48:09.151-05:002015-01-10T08:48:09.151-05:00Even if you agree with their article (which I don&...Even if you agree with their article (which I don't) there's the minor little fact that there is no way in hell that the tests will ever be decoupled from the high stakes, so it's kind of pointless to try to sell people on the idea of tests without high stakes.<br /><br />BTW, how can an article be both "earnest" and "slick"?Diennehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04570040547158789834noreply@blogger.com